#The wilson memo plus
#The wilson memo free

#The wilson memo plus

Citizens to sue federal Contractors who have defrauded the United States it imposes penalties of 3x the amount taken by fraud, plus fees and costs, and awards the citizen complainant(s) a portion of the total damages recovered. Fortunately, the law empowers us вЂ“ any American вЂ“ to do exactly that. To finally вЂget atвЂ™ the criminal diversion of funds behind these Unacknowledged Special Access Programs, it is necessary to bring Fraud charges against those *outside* of government who willingly participated in the criminality required to maintain the Coverup all these years.

#The wilson memo free

There are tools which Ufology has never attempted to exercise, which now represent among our only hopes to discover the underlying realities of the ETUFO problem before Orwellian Censorship, Surveillance, Repression and Social Engineering *forever end* our dreams of an вЂOpen CosmosвЂ™, and free exchange with ETs under mutually respectful conditions. Since вЂњDisclosureвЂќ has ultimately Failed, with the legally-mandated candor of the June 24th report effectively ignored вЂ“ almost in total вЂ“ by the Deep State, we must seek other strategies to reveal the hidden data, truths, atrocities, and assorted *Crimes Against Humanity* вЂ“ both Human and Alien вЂ“ that continue to be concealed by the Coverup. Ie/ theyвЂ™d buy the cover story, as they usually do. TheyвЂ™d look at her evidence and dismiss it as evidence of difficulties in oversighting the B-2 program.

But IвЂ™m not sure that dyed-in-the wool sceptics would see it that way. Perhaps Northrup, and later NG, was the keeper of the great secret all along and they pulled off some key breakthroughs which then helped to develop the B-2? That would explain quite a lot. That suspicion has been based on publicly available patents and the believed lack of conventional thrust from its engines: Going well beyond BrittвЂ™s hypothesis, the B-2 has also long been speculated to have incorporated some electro-gravitic technology into its design. (Incidentally it also quotes Paul Kaminski, one of the Pentagon officials referred to in the Davis-Wilson Memo.) Supporting BrittвЂ™s work, this 1989 Washington Post article about the black budget world alludes to how tightly the GAO was controlled in its access to information about the B-2.

Д›ig Bucket of Money- the B-2 is a hyper-expensive aircraft and its development ran massively over budget.

Дљir Force funded, rather than Navy/Marines.

Timing (in place through the вЂ80s and вЂ90s).

Her honing in on the B-2 program as a babushka doll that the crash retrieval program hides within is IMO valid. But itвЂ™s enjoyable to be wrong when the truth is as important and exciting as this. That surprises me as most of us had lined up Lockheed Martin as the prime suspect. This is also a reasonable circumstantial case that NG is the firm referred to in the Davis вЂ“ Wilson memo. I think it strengthens the overall case that the Davis-Wilson Memo speaks to facts about VADM WilsonвЂ™s efforts to get access to the UFO crash retrieval WUSAP After a while, a person can find sources of material that appeal to their level of beliefs and enrich their knowledge about these compelling phenomenon. It is very interesting and informative to access a lot of these new or fairly recent (within the past several years) webcasts. The Skinwalker ranch show seems to show that connection. He said that Ufologists should entertain looking at the other high strangeness issues and, conversely, cryptozoologists should consider issues involving UFOs when both types of events seem to be connected. He also deals with high strangeness incidents (including animal mutilations including dolphins)/cryptids and said something that made a lot of sense.

After finishing watching these, I watched a recent one on Mystery Wire with George Knapp doing his usual excellent job of interviewing an Englishman named Paul Sinclair who looks addresses ufology and possibly was a child abductee. There are a bunch of those being made, including yours of course.